User talk:Uswibèta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikiquote

Welcome to Simple English Wikiquote! I'm very happy that you are here. Thank you for the Babel boxes and other things. --Coppertwig 17:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are good! I like to help you with those babel boxes! Uswibèta 14:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Uswibèta:

I see that we are the only peoples here, and you can tell me what is happening here?

Thanks.

--Brunoy Bruyanovich Bruyanov 02:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is Wikiquote? Here are articles with things people said.
Why are we the only users? Wikiquote is not a really busy project.
Why is this Wikiquote propose for deletion? People think there cannot be quotes in Simplified English. Uswibèta 05:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Vandal

Hello, I am not accusing you of creating the recent vandalism but i think it may of been a possibility as you are becoming dissatisfied with the project --Z 22:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I donot understand completely. Ask a check user and see I'm not vandals you mean. When you blocked the users of vandalism I think you also blocked their IP for 1 day. See recent changes, it was not me. Uswibèta 05:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess it wasn't you. Anyways can you please comment on my adminship request--67.86.43.59 00:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which adminship request? Uswibèta 17:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the one on the main wikiquote

here? I see 3 which one? Uswibèta 06:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help at meta. I'm glad you're here. I hope you're not angry at me about the talk about red links.  :-) --Coppertwig 17:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure not. Uswibèta 06:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message.

Hello. I like getting messages.

We have a very small number of people here, so let's try to be friendly with the other users. Let's let Z be on the list of past administrators. There are many things we can change on many pages. We don't need to take away things that other contributors just finished writing. --Coppertwig 02:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And what if vandal changes a page? Let it stay? I don't understand it anymore. Uswibèta 06:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote that badly. We need to revert (take away) the changes of vandals. I meant, Z is a good contributor. We can change other pages. We don't need to revert things that Z does. Maybe I wrote that badly too. Maybe there will be times when it is good to revert changes that you or I or Z or other good contributors do. But, for now it's better to look for other things to do -- and it's easy because there are many other things to do. --Coppertwig 13:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So next time vandal like yesterday comes we need to let it stay. I understand now. But why did user:Cometstyles revert if that is not good? Does he don't know? --Uswibèta 08:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, that is not what I mean. It is good to revert vandals. Thanks to Cometstyles. --Coppertwig 17:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Maybe what I said to you was not very friendly. I'm sorry. --Coppertwig 00:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now I don't understand it anymore. Let's close this dicusion. --Uswibèta 09:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008

Sádar ý 2008! Happy New Year! --Uswibèta 09:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!! --Coppertwig 15:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Uswibèta 17:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]