Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety

This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments to another page, but not here.

RfA closed as successful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Tiptoety

Tiptoety (talk • changes)

End date: October 2nd

I am interested in being an administrator for the purpose of assisting with janitorial issues. I am aware I have made few edits here, but I am an active administrator at both commons and en.Wikipedia, as well as a member of the foundations OTRS team. Because of this, I feel I can be trusted with the extra buttons and can assist Simple Wikiquote's small group of administrators. Tiptoety (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Self nomination

Support

1. Support MBisanz ^talk 00:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
2. Support Trusted user. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
3. Support - Sure, why not. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
4. Support I remember Tiptoety as a very trusted editor, even from over a year ago. No problems here, could help out. — RyanCross (talk) 06:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
5. Support SUL (talk) 10:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
6. Support - WQ:AGF. Snake311 (alternative) (talk) 17:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
7. Support Tempodivalse [talk] 20:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
8. Support Sure, why not? Pmlineditor^Talk 15:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Oppose, what would they use it for? No assertion of activity throughout their contributions. Blurpeace (talk) 02:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Tiptoety said he would use it for janitorial work. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Would probably be a net positive for the project, though I still hold reservations. If they'd like to prove that they'd use the tools, then they should be actively making edits to the project. Blurpeace (talk) 02:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

1. Oppose, although Tiptoety would be a good admin, he hasn't edited here, and this wiki has 12 admins, which include 3 active users at other simple projects. I don't think that this project needs another inactive admin. Griffinofwales (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

   I never said I would be inactive. I am willing to offer my services here as an administrator, and understand that means actually using the tools. Tiptoety (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• I'll be around to close this RfA tomorrow evening. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

  Isn't this RfA due to be closed two days from today, not tomorrow? In any case, I'll be around and available to close the RFA then as well. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

  Well, October 1 UTC starts in a few hours, so October 2 UTC would be in a little over 1 day. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

  And just as a side note, I am in no rush. :-) Tiptoety (talk) 21:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

  Technically, the full week would be up just after midnight on October 3rd UTC. Tempodivalse [talk] 22:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments in another part.