User talk:Tempodivalse/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikiquote

This is an archive of old discussions. Please don't change it.


Welcome!

Welcome to Simple English Wikiquote


Hello Tempodivalse/Archive 1, and welcome to Simple English Wikiquote!

We hope you are happy editing here. You should start by reading these pages:

If you want to meet and talk with other members, you can leave a message at Wikiquote:Simple talk. Just remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) after them. Also, visit our welcome page for newcomers, and consider signing the Guestbook. Again, welcome to the Simple English Wikiquote! TheAE talk 18:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much! Tempodivalse @en.wikinews 22:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translating

I did a quick check of all your contributions today. Winston Churchill, Charles Spurgeon, Harry S. Truman, Shigeru Miyamoto, Ron Wilson, and Harry S. Truman were awesome, and very simple! On Henry David Thoreau, generally, websites like quotationspage, quotedb, brainyquote, etc. aren't reliable sources, but better than none. Google Books is very good for finding sources. But otherwise, you are doing very well! You've caught onto Simple English very well. Welcome again. :) TheAE talk 01:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Thanks

Thanks for the Barnstar! GT5162 19:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.  Tempodivalse  20:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! TheAE talk 20:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll try to do my best.  Tempodivalse  20:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JarlaxleArtemis is also known as "Grawp" and is banned on enwiki for causing disruption. Any similar usernames are immediately blocked. GT5162 (talk) 18:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Do we block users based on their actions on other wikis here? We don't do that over at the English Wikinews, but I'm uncertain of the policy on that here.  Tempodivalse  18:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, Tempodivalse, you're right. But Grawp is another story. TheAE talk 18:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that's right, isn't he the guy who was had an army of socks and sent thousands of profane and harassing emails to admins on en.wiki? In that case, a block is probably justified, to prevent a possible repeat of that here.  Tempodivalse  18:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the title blacklist on enwiki, all names that are similar to "Grawp" cannot be used in new accounts, new articles or destinations of page moves. Smaller wikis, such as this one, have less filters to stop them. GT5162 (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review

Hi, please could you comment on my editor review? Thanks. GT5162 (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good catches! I wrote that awhile ago, and didn't proof-read very well. Thanks. :) TheAE talk 03:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.  Tempodivalse  13:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I r sory, wi will not do that again. MARMOT (talk) 23:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

with your RfB. Not like you need it. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 21:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tempodivalse 23:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat

Congratulations, you are now a bureaucrat for Simple English Wikiquote! Please read WQ:BUR if you have not already, and make sure you know all the rules and processes of bureaucrats. I'm sure you'll be a fine bureaucrat. Thank you. — RyanCross (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll do my best. Tempodivalse 13:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! Shapiros10 (talk) 20:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, congrats. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Tempodivalse 00:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikiquote News: Issue Four

Issue 3 - DATE

2,696 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes.


Special Announcements Other Information

  • Navbox collapsing Simple English Wikiquote now has to ability to close navigational boxes. Some text just needed to be added to MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Common.js.
  • Rollback Rollback has now been enabled for trusted users at Simple English Wikiquote. Currently, there are 5 rollbackers.
  • Quote of the Week Quote of the Week replaced the previous Quote of the Day at Simple English Wikiquote.
  • New logo A logo was proposed for Simple English Wikiquote, however, this proposal was rejected by the developers because it didn't meet the visual identity guidelines.

Simple English Wikiquote's revival... (read it!)


The Wikiquote News links


Pmlineditor  Talk 17:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Wikiquote News: Issue 5

Issue 5 - September 19, 2009

2,696 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes.


Special Announcements Other Information

  • Very Good Pages Simple English Wikiquote now has Very Good Pages per the discussion at Simple Talk. Propose your VGPs here.
  • Rollback Simple English Wikiquote now has 19 rollbackers.

Pmlinediter talks of VGP and some goals in his second article... (read it!)


The Wikiquote News links


PmlineditorTalk 15:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Thank you for the welcome; correct me if I am wrong but I believe I have seen you somewhere. Is it on Wikinews? :) Ali Rana (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is Wikinews, I'm an active editor there as well. See wikinews:en:User:Tempodivalse. Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk] 02:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Simple English Wikiquote News: Issue 6

Issue 3 - DATE

2,696 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes.


Special Announcements Other Information


Pmlinediter talks about several issues in his third article... (read it!)


The Wikiquote News links


Pmlineditor  10:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Us 'crats have our work cut out for us!

I'll take Maximillion Pegasus's RfA if you take Pmlinediter's RfB?  :) –Juliancolton | Talk 01:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh. :-) Sounds good to me. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If my RfB passes, ... (figure it out by yourself :P) Pmlineditor  07:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankspam

You're welcome, you deserved getting the bits :-) Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk] 13:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxies

Hi, Tempodivalse, I hope that you are well this evening. I noticed that you were around blocking open proxies, and, if you haven’t already, you may wish to check admin zzuuzz’s block log on the English Wikipedia. The majority of his blocks are open proxies, so this may be of some use to you. :) Warmly, –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 17:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or you might try the simplewp block proxy list. ^_^ Pmlineditor  17:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've mostly been getting my OP lists from meta:Meta:Open proxy detection and w:en:Wikipedia:Open proxy detection, but I'll use zzuuzz's block log list on Wikipedia too, thanks for suggesting it. :-) Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk] 17:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite welcome, though I confess to having selfish motives as a sometime target of proxy attacks. :) –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 17:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your name is in teh blacklistz. Pmlineditor  17:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and I appreciate that very much. :) That doesn't prevent my user page or talk page from being vandalised, though. So the more open proxies that are shown the door, the better, as far as I am concerned. –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 18:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can semi- your user and talk page if you'd like. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<-Umm...OPs don't get indef'd, since IPs should never be indef'd. 1-3 years is usually enough time for the IP to transfer off the proxy. Griffinofwales (talk) 02:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Griffin said. NW (Talk) 02:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. According to Wikiquote:Blocks#Proxies the IP may be blocked indefinitely if it is an OP. I've always blocked OPs indef before. Tempodivalse [talk] 02:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IPs can change from being an open proxy to not being one within 1 year or less. So why indef? --Bsadowski1 (talk) 03:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's my understanding that OPs rarely switch off. Given the vast number of these proxies that have been blocked here, it seems like an unnecessary effort to keep reblocking them year after year. There's more rationale on this at a recent en.wikinews discussion. Tempodivalse [talk] 03:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OPs do get indef blocked at times. The main reason is when the IP addy is owned and used by a company that runs open proxies for a living. fr33kman t - c 03:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Wikiquote News: Issue 7

Issue 3 - DATE

2,696 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes.


Special Announcements Other Information


Pmlinediter talks about the hard work needed to reach the goals he set in his fourth article... (read it!)


The Wikiquote News links


Pmlineditor  17:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi. Thanks for the warm welcome. :-). Regards, Trivelt (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Tempodivalse [talk] 17:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]