User talk:Razorflame
Welcome to Simple English Wikiquote! --Coppertwig 03:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the welcome :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- That was 7 months ago. :P -- RyanCross (talk) 01:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Just goes to show how inactive I have been on this project :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
RyanCross' RfA thanks
Many thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Issue 2 - January 22, 2009 700 users, 305 articles, 3,305 pages, 15,097 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |
Ahem Yourself! ;)
LOL. :D I only deliver to those in the subscribe list. I'll let you have it this time, though. ;) (Please add your name there :) American Eagle (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar!
Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!
This is for all your recent hard work, editing, and nominating me! Good Job and Thank You! American Eagle (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
- Oh, didn't even see this here ;). Cheers, Razorflame 01:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Bureaucratship
Yes, I'll be happy if you nominated me for bureaucratship. Maxim originally nominated me, so I asked if he wanted to re-nominate also. I feel I could do much more for our project as a bureaucrat. Thank you. — RyanCross (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this project needs 3 bureaucrats at this time. If AE's RfB goes through, then I don't think that I would be able to nominate you because 3 crats on this Wikiquote is too many at this time. If AE's nomination falls through, though, then I would still be happy to nominate you. Cheers, Razorflame 05:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Now Razorflame, that will make him want to oppose me. Too late. :) I don't see the harm in three 'crats. American Eagle (talk) 05:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- (e/c) On English Wikiquote, where I'm an administrator at, there's a saying that goes, "The more administrators there are the better." I also believe, "The more bureaucrats there are the better." An important question to think about is this: will adding another bureaucrat harm the project or be a positive move to one?
- I believe bureaucrat actions would be done much more quickly with more bureaucrats. I don't see the harm in adding too many bureaucrats... or at least three for now. I've been an admin for about 6 months now, and have made 1000+ edits, so you can say I've done a lot for the project. And I do admit, AE is more active than me as far as editing, but I check in SEWQ at least several times a day to watch for vandalism or something I can give my opinion on, so I could also watch for bureaucrat requests also. Anyway, of course, it's entirely your choice if you want to nominate or not. — RyanCross (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- If that is the stance that you have, then I wouldn't mind nominating you if you still wish me to. Cheers, Razorflame 20:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry
Re [1]: don't worry. I think it was OK to start that discussion. And maybe it was my fault. Maybe I should have answered you when you said this. Also maybe I should have answered EVula here. I thought about what you said, and I thought about answering. I wasn't sure whether it was better to answer or to say nothing. Let me know if you still want to talk about it. You might be interested in what I said here and here. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 20:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- I answered on my talk page. I'm sorry I took a long time. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 00:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
RfB thanks
Thank you for voting in my request of bureaucratship (yes, I can spell that now :P). RyanCross has closed the request has "successful" and I have now been granted the bureaucrat flag. Special thanks to my nom, Razorflame. I was not expecting to pass (as I have less support % than my previous RfB). But, I greatly thank you all for this opportunity, I do not plan to let you down. In fact, I promise to do my very best not to. :) God bless, TheAE talk 03:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Issue 3 - February 21, 2009 781 users, 320 articles, 3,438 pages, 17,000 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |
The Wikiquote News: Issue Four
Issue 3 - DATE 2,699 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |
Pmlineditor Talk 17:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Simple Wikiquote News: Issue 5
Issue 5 - September 19, 2009 2,699 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |
PmlineditorTalk 15:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
The Simple English Wikiquote News: Issue 6
Issue 3 - DATE 2,699 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |
Pmlineditor ∞ 10:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Thankspam
I promise to do my best and justify the trust the community has placed in me! Pmlineditor ∞ 13:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC) |
Simple Wikiquote News: Issue 7
Issue 3 - DATE 2,699 users, 588 articles, 5,942 pages, 34,198 changes. | ||
| ||
Special Announcements | – | Other Information |
| ||
|
The Wikiquote News links |